The Blog

Understanding ORS 31.230: Wrongful Use of Civil Proceeding At Johnson Law, P.C., we believe in empowering our clients and the community with knowledge about the laws that protect their rights. One important...

In Oregon, uninsured motorist coverage may apply to an injured e-scooter rider even when the rider was not inside a car, but the answer is highly policy-specific and often turns on hit-and-run rules, phantom-vehicle proof, scooter classification, and owned-vehicle or regular-use exclusions.

In an Oregon e-bike accident claim after a crash with a car, a Class 1, 2, or 3 label can matter, but it does not decide liability by itself. What usually matters more is whether the bike fits Oregon's legal definition of an electric assisted bicycle, where and how it was being ridden, and how Oregon comparative fault applies.

An Oregon bicyclist hit by an uninsured, underinsured, hit-and-run, or phantom driver may need to look beyond the at-fault driver's policy. In some cases, the injured rider's own auto policy may help, but coverage often turns on insured status, Oregon's UM/UIM statutes, and strict claim-preservation rules.

In Oregon, opening a vehicle door into a bicyclist's path can violate ORS 811.490. In Portland, the strongest dooring claims usually depend on fast evidence preservation: photos, witnesses, roadway layout, parked position, and official records.

ORS 31.152 is an Oregon law that allows defendants to file a special motion to strike in tort cases. This motion can be used to dismiss lawsuits based on protected speech or petition activities....