Skip to main content
4 min read

NHTSA 2027 Pedestrian Crashworthiness: Results Explained

Learn what NHTSA’s 2027 pedestrian crashworthiness results mean: pass/fail labels, the 60% points threshold and impact protection—not braking or stars.
Conceptual editorial illustration of a magnifying glass over a generic car-front model, not an actual NHTSA test or rated vehicle.

NHTSA’s pedestrian crashworthiness assessment looks at how a vehicle protects a pedestrian during an impact. Passing means meeting criteria for assessed head, upper-leg and lower-limb impacts—not a guarantee that a pedestrian will avoid injury in a collision.

In its September 18, 2026 announcement, NHTSA said 102 model-year 2027 models from 10 manufacturers met the criteria. That count does not establish the total number of eligible models or mean NHTSA physically tested all 102. Here is how to read the result labels, understand the points threshold and distinguish impact protection from automatic braking.

Impact protection and automatic braking measure different things

NHTSA lists pedestrian crashworthiness separately from pedestrian automatic emergency braking (PAEB):

AssessmentWhat it looks at
Pedestrian crashworthinessProtection against injury when a vehicle makes contact with a pedestrian.
Pedestrian automatic emergency braking (PAEB)Detecting a pedestrian and braking to help avoid a collision.

When comparing results, check which assessment you are reading. An impact-protection result does not tell you how the vehicle’s automatic braking performs.

Which impacts does the assessment cover?

The assessment covers head, upper-leg and lower-limb impacts. These scenarios do not cover every real collision or predict whether a particular person would be injured. The announcement also does not establish an observed reduction in real-world injuries.

How to read pass, fail, pending and not submitted

NHTSA distinguishes four result labels:

LabelHow to read it
PassThe assessment criteria are met.
FailThe assessment criteria are not met.
PendingThe status is pending; do not count it as a failure.
Not submittedNo result has been submitted; this is not a failed test.

The label alone does not explain why a result is pending or not submitted. Neither status establishes a vehicle defect or a manufacturer’s motives.

What the 60% threshold actually measures

NHTSA pedestrian assessment points: up to 18 for head, 9 for upper-leg and 9 for lower-limb impacts; the 21.6-point threshold is not an injury-reduction percentage.

Section II.F of NHTSA’s final agency decision describes a maximum of 36 assessment points:

  • Head impacts: up to 18 points.
  • Upper-leg impacts: up to 9 points.
  • Lower-limb impacts: up to 9 points.

A vehicle meets the threshold at 21.600 out of 36 points (60%). That is a share of the available assessment points—not a 60% reduction in injuries or crash risk, or a 60% chance of avoiding harm.

This is a pass/fail assessment, not a pedestrian star rating. Although the broader New Car Assessment Program (NCAP) uses five-star branding, a pedestrian pass does not award stars or rank a vehicle against other passing models.

Who supplies the results, and what does NHTSA verify?

Sections II.D and II.E of the final agency decision describe how manufacturers submit results and NHTSA checks selected vehicles:

  • Manufacturers submit their own results. Results based on modeled predictions require evidence validating those predictions through physical testing.
  • NHTSA verifies selected vehicles to check the submitted results.

This article has not independently checked individual model or configuration results or which vehicles NHTSA selected for verification.

A quick checklist for reading a result

Before drawing a conclusion from a pedestrian safety entry:

  1. Check the assessment: is it about impact protection or automatic braking?
  2. Read the status: pass, fail, pending and not submitted have different meanings.
  3. Keep the score in context: 60% refers to assessment points, not a reduction in injury risk.

These are NCAP consumer results, not a new minimum vehicle standard or a determination of compliance with Federal Motor Vehicle Safety Standards (FMVSS).

An assessment result also does not establish what a driver could see during a collision. For that separate issue, see visibility questions in a pedestrian collision.

For legal questions, see Johnson Law’s information on Portland pedestrian injury claims. An NCAP result alone does not determine responsibility for an injury.

This article provides educational information only, not legal advice.

Sources

Client-First Fee Promise

Client First = Bills First, Fees Second

Your unpaid medical bills do not have to make your lawyer's fee bigger. Johnson Law subtracts qualifying medical bills before calculating our fee, helping clients keep more of their settlement.

Applies to qualifying cases. Results vary.

Share:

Related Posts

View All Posts »

Portland Event Traffic Injuries: Who May Be Responsible for Pedestrian Crashes, Barricades, and Crowd Control?

Using recurring Portland events such as the Rose Festival as general context, this article explains how pedestrian or bicycle injuries near temporary traffic changes may involve several different actors. It also explains why permits do not prove fault, how field evidence can change or become unavailable, and when Oregon public-body notice rules may require prompt review. It does not describe a particular Rose Festival incident.

Related pages and next steps

Continue to the most useful service pages, guides, and trust pages for this topic.

Explore Johnson Law services

Helpful next pages if you are still researching your legal options.

  • Practice areas

    Review the main case types Johnson Law handles across Oregon.

  • Locations

    Find city-specific pages and local service area information.

  • Resources

    Browse guides, FAQs, checklists, and educational legal materials.

  • Free consultation

    Speak with Johnson Law about your case and next steps.

Build trust before you decide